Lluis Oviedo Explanatory Limits in the Cognitive Science of Religion: Theoretical Matrix and Evidence Levels

Oviedo L. (2018) Explanatory Limits in the Cognitive Science of Religion: Theoretical Matrix and Evidence Levels. In: van Eyghen H., Peels R., van den Brink G. (eds) New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion, vol 4. Springer, Cham

Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) has developed for almost 20 years naturalistic explanations on religious mind and behavior, opening that field to scientific scrutiny. Scholars used to study religion from a more humanistic tradition or a hermeneutic approach could feel surprised by the application of biological-evolutionary, cognitive and neurological means to better explain religion. Not too confident with the new approach, many traditional students of religion, like theologians, religion philosophers, phenomenologists, and even psychologists, were often dazzled by the exhibition of new terms, concepts and ways to understand religion, beyond the traditional frames. Time is ripe for an assessment on the plausibility that these new theories exhibit, taking into account their respective frameworks and the reported empirical evidence.

 Gardiner argued that there was no religious intelligence ie there was no natural section of the human brain that explains religion, 
however ecstasy is recorded throughout history, perhaps related to sexual pleasure
frenzy is often described, not always psychotic, 
pleasure is a natural goal.
Is life after death just an evolutionary driver